Clearing The Confusion For Once And For All
Even artists who deal in eco-art sometimes use the term as a synonym of environmental art. The reality is a bit in shades of grey. Presently, there are no set definitions for land art, environmental art, and eco-art. But when broadly considered, the differences between them are apparent.
- The umbrella term used to encompass eco-art, natural art, land art, and related art is environmental art. Because eco-art is a type of environmental art, many people use them interchangeably.
- Eco-art differs from environmental art in the sense that it is not merely an art that incorporates earth or land. It is contemporary and activist in nature.
- The correct method to using the two terms is: at the initial exploration stage of the genre eco-art it can be called environmental art. But when we go more profound, it merely is eco-art.
The Roots Of The Two Terms
Art that comes under environmental art doesn’t necessarily need to be about ecological problems. It includes them only in a minority of times. The root of environmental art wat to create an artistic perception of nature. The vision is creative. The source of eco-art is eco-friendly. Every piece that is created under it is meant to inform the world of the issues the planet is facing right now.
Eco-art is all about building art that:
- highlights a definite ecological issue
- improves an area environmentally
- addresses topics that impact ecosystems such as economics, ethics, culture, aesthetics and politics
The best technique to comprehend the difference between the two terms is to understand the definition of each word:
- Ecological – the interconnection of living creatures, e.g., ecosystems present in nature.
- Environmental – connected to the surroundings and outside conditions.